Exercise ‹2›:

{⟨g1,g2⟩∈CFG({a,b})2∣L(g1)∩L(g2)≠∅}≤{⟨G1,G2,G3⟩∣L(G1)∩L(G2)≠∅  ∧  L(G2)∩L(G3)≠∅  ∧  L(G1)∩L(G3)=∅}\{\langle g_1,g_2\rangle\in\mathtt{CFG}(\{a,b\})^2\mid\mathcal{L}(g_1)\cap\mathcal{L}(g_2)\neq\emptyset\}\quad\leq\quad\{\langle G_1,G_2,G_3\rangle\mid\mathcal{L}(G_1)\cap\mathcal{L}(G_2)\neq\emptyset\;\wedge\;\mathcal{L}(G_2)\cap\mathcal{L}(G_3)\neq\emptyset\;\wedge\;\mathcal{L}(G_1)\cap\mathcal{L}(G_3)=\emptyset\}
Reduce the non-empty intersection problem on CFGs over {a,b}\{a,b\} to the set of tuples of three CFGs G1,G2,G3G_1,G_2,G_3 such that G1G_1 and G2G_2 generate at least one common word, G2G_2 and G3G_3 generate at least one common word, but G1G_1 and G3G_3 do not generate a common word, in order to prove that such set is undecidable (not recursive).
Authors: Guillem Godoy / Documentation:
To be able to submit you need to log in, register, or become a guest.